PSNet is a national web-based resource featuring the latest news and essential resources on patient safety. During the late 1980s, the Joint Commission developed a national performance measurement system, the IMSystem, to incorporate information about the process and outcomes of … The Joint Commission’s methodology is considered the "gold standard" in health care today. Accreditation – A Definition. They focus on four areas that support accreditation services: information dissemination, public policy initiatives, performance measurement and patient safety. Papers published in the Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety are often highlighted by the AHRQ Patient Safety Network (PSNet). The Joint Commission advocates the use of patient safety measures, the spread of information, the measurement of performance, and the introduction of public policy recommendations. JOINT COMMISSION RESEARCH PAPER Engage with The Joint Commission enterprise to help improve your organization's performance Gain Access to Valuable Information We’re giving you easy access to valuable resources that will help you on your path to delivering the highest level of quality and patient care, including: As reported in the January 2020 issue of… ORYX is the Joint Commission's initiative to integrate performance measurement into the accreditation process. The Joint Commission is a nationally recognized leader in performance measurement and implemented standardized performance measures for internal quality improvement, accreditation and certification. 2 • Usually a voluntary process by which a government or non-government agency grants recognition to health care institutions which meet certain standards that require continuous improvement in structures, processes, and outcomes. Maryanne Popovich, RN, MPH, is the director o f the joint Commission's Home Care Accreditation Services. Additional performance measurement systems would be approved over time, and approved systems would be monitored to ensure they adhere to the established criteria as these continue to evolve. ORIGINAL RESEARCH Hospital Performance Trends on National Quality Measures and the Association With Joint Commission Accreditation Stephen P. Schmaltz, MPH, PhD1*,Scott C. Williams, PsyD1 Mark R. Chassin, MD, MPP, MPH 1 Jerod M. Loeb, PhD1, Robert M. Wachter, MD2 1The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois; 2University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Joint Commission Patient Safety Initiatives. The articles described in this database were identified through a scoping literature review performed by researchers at The Joint Commission in 2016, and through annual follow-up reviews. The Joint Commission Quality Initiatives . Beginning with accredited hospitals and long term care organizations, the ORYX initiative will be implemented across all accreditation programs over the next several years. The goal of The Joint Commission accreditation process is to monitor and accelerate performance improvement in health care organizations. According to the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), a KPI is “a measurement tool used to monitor and evaluate the quality of important governance, management, clinical, and support functions” (19). Performance Measurement Network. If that is the case, it would suggest that performance measurement initiatives may be enhanced by public reporting and accountability and not just by measurement and feedback. The Joint Commission categorizes its process performance measures into accountability and non-accountability measures. In 1987, The Joint Commission announced its Agenda for Change, which outlined a series of major steps designed to modernize the accreditation process.A key component of the Agenda for Change was the eventual introduction of standardized core performance measures into the accreditation process. It is possible that many of the hospitals in the 2011 cohort chose to implement the measures earlier but elected not to report them to the Joint Commission until 2011. The performance gap between Joint Commission‐accredited and non‐accredited hospitals increased over the five years of the study.